PLEASE DO BUSINESS WITH THOSE WHO DO BUSINESS WITH US -- OUR ADVERTISERS.

THANK YOU FOR VISITING OUR WEB PORTAL. PLEASE TELL A FRIEND.

YOU can speak out and be heard by having your own "Column" - Visit the "Public Opinion" Section above.

WE ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK ALL OUR SOURCES FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS IN MAKING US AMERICA'S NUMBER ONE NEWS INFORMATION PORTAL.

ATTENTION TALK SHOW HOSTS: We are honored that many radio talk show hosts use our Web Portal for their "show prep." We would appreciate your occasional mention of our site to your audience. Thanks!

ADVERTISEMENT: If you want to advertise your business or Web Site, send us an email by clicking on "Contact" above. It could be the best business decision you make.

ABC Online Canada National Post Daily Telegraph The Observer Wired News Xinhua News

VOA VIEW -- Is the opinion of "Voice of Americans", which is a private entity not affiliated in any way with the United States government or any of its agencies. The opinions expressed here, in whatever medium or format, are not necessarily the opinions of the ownership or advertisers of this web site - 0415.

     Minneapolis Federal Reserve President Neel Kashkari thinks there’s nearly a 50-50 chance that interest rates will need to move significantly higher to bring down inflation.  The Feds must stop raising interest rate - it is causing higher inflation.

     In an essay the central bank official posted, he said there’s a strong case to be made that the U.S. economy is headed toward a “high-pressure equilibrium.” Such a condition would involve continued growth featuring strong consumer spending and “the economic flywheel spinning.”  In that instance, the inflation rate falls but stays above the Fed’s 2% target, posing a challenge for policymakers.  “The case supporting this scenario is that most of the disinflationary gains we have observed to date have been due to supply-side factors, such as workers reentering the labor force and supply chains resolving, rather than monetary policy restraining demand,” he wrote in a post titled, “Policy Has Tightened a Lot. Is It Enough?”

     Noting that rate-sensitive areas such as housing and autos have held strong despite Fed tightening, Kashkari remarked, “These dynamics raise the question, How tight is policy right now? If policy were truly tight, would we observe such robust activity?”  Services inflation, excluding the cost of renting shelter, has been coming down, but has otherwise remained elevated, raising longer-term concerns.  “Once supply factors have fully recovered, is policy tight enough to complete the job of bringing services inflation back to target? It might not be, in which case we would have to push the federal funds rate higher, potentially meaningfully higher,” Kashkari said. “Today I put a 40 percent probability on this scenario.”

     Of course, that still means he assigns a 60% chance of the Fed sticking its “soft-landing” goal, with inflation coming back to the goal without a harmful recession. He cited “the actual progress we have made against inflation and the actual labor market performance” as factors contributing to policymakers reaching their goal.  However, the comments come the same day as with JPMorgan Chase  CEO Jamie Dimon, in which the bank executive entertains the possibility that the Fed may have to take its benchmark rate up to 7%. The fed funds rate currently is targeted in a range between 5.25%-5.5%.